Success and Failure for Hereditary Harrop Formulae

We introduce the foundational issues involved in incorporating the Negation as Failure (NAF) rule into the framework of rst-order hereditary Harrop formulae of Miller et al. This is a larger class of formulae than Horn clauses, and so the technicalities are more intricate than in the Horn clause case. As programs may grow during execution in this framework, the role of NAF and the Closed World Assumption (CWA) need some modiication, and for this reason we introduce the notion of a completely deened predicate, which may be thought of as a localisation of the CWA. We also show how this notion may be used to deene a notion of NAF for a more general class of goals than literals alone. We also show how an extensional notion of universal quantiication may be incorporated. This makes our framework somewhat diierent from that of Miller et al., but not essentially so. We also show how to construct a Kripke-like model for the extended class of programs. This is essentially a denotational semantics for logic programs, in that it provides a mapping from the program to a pair of sets of atoms which denote the success and ((nite) failure sets. This is inspired by the work of Miller on the semantics of rst-order hereditary Harrop formulae. Note that no restriction on the class of programs is needed in this approach, and that our construction needs no more than ! iterations. This necessitates a slight departure from the standard methods, but the important properties of the construction still hold.